Quantcast
Channel: Film Critic JohnsonThomas
Viewing all 783 articles
Browse latest View live

Cigarette ki Tarah, Hindi Bollywood Film Review, Johnson Thomas, Rating: *

$
0
0


Cigarette Ki Tarah(Hindi) Rating:  *    It’s All up in smoke!

 





Hindi Film Review
Johnson Thomas

No Smoke No fire

Film: Cigarette ki Tarah
Cast: Bhoop Yaduvanshi , Madhurima Tuli, Yuvika Chaudhary,
Director:Akashaditya Lama

Rating:  *
 
A moniker with negative associations might be intriguing but if the content is not strong enough the disappointment just gets unbearable. That’s exactly what happened with ‘cigarette ki Tarah.’  In fact one couldn’t figure out the logic behind the title. The narrative other than constant crude references to cigarettes and the harm it can cause has little  titular association  to propound.
This production is probably aimed at turning a ‘ relative’ newcomer into a hero. The mechanics for that are all there. The opening sequence is a chase that evolves into a Houdini act with the hero bashing up a few policemen who are too busy grandstanding than ferreting out the culprit they came to capture. Cut to the past where the so called nondescript lead actor (Bhoop Yaduvanshi) playing the role of a delinquent son Nikhil Dabur, of a disgraced Police Superintendent  of Kanpur , picks up a fight with the local goonda at a wayside dhaba and ends up single handedly vanquishing a passel of them without a single scratch on his smoothly oiled back. Impressive beginnings for a wannabe star but who is gonna buy into such unbelievable fantasy especially when the actor has little  worth either in terms of screen presence, acting potential or chocolatey good looks.  The vanquished goonda uses his ministerial clout to set the police on this lone ranger but his father’s standing allows him a let-off with a warning. Then comes the invitation for a visit to Goa from a childhood friend (Yuvika). Off he goes to Goa, gets pally with the pretty friend but doesn’t fall in love with her.He is also interested in her friend ,a firang who is constantly showing off  her assets to all who can see. Then he bumps into yet another pretty little rich girl (Madhurima Tuli) a few times and the two fall into bed and ta-da are in love. The next thing we know is that her slime ball of a husband D’Gama (Sudesh Berry going over-the-top)  and the hero’s boss ,  has been murdered and who better to be the fall guy than our invincible hero.  So now you have to deal with the murder mystery as well as the yucky love story. And it’s a tedious roll all the way to the end.
 
The actor playing the lead is a terrible misfit. He cannot act for sure- several drunken scenes don’t an actor make, especially when they appear more abhorrent than likeable.  Even the action is so put on that it’s just not palatable , Yuvika looks pretty but she is so hysterical that she appears to be a dimwit here. Prashant Narayanan as the cop with an attitude is so low-brow that you want to just say shut-up everytime he opens his mouth. The only person with an iota of screen presence is Madhurima Tuli. Despite a hackneyed role she has a certain poise and understanding of the craft that the rest appear to have little knowledge of. The songs are ok but who wants to sit through a movie with never ending series of songs. The story did have  some positives but the treatment and the narration were so out of sorts that everything got negated. Going back and forth in time can grate on you nerves especially when it’s done with little finesse.  There’s a whole lot of unintelligible nonsense of display here.  Women are objects of lust and the hero is someone who every female in the vicinity think of as a hunk. There’s no accounting for taste really. A competent director and a better choice of actors could have made this a worthwhile experience , But that was obviously not to be. Though the production values are competent enough, the resultant experience  is way below par. Not something one would want to repeat. Ooops sorry ..even the first time would be life –threatening!


Brahmaputra Valley Short film Festival 2013

Picks and Piques/Snippet Reviews of films released on 21 dec 2012,Johnson Thomas

$
0
0






Picks and Piques/Snippet Reviews of Film Released on 21st Dec2012

 

Dabangg 2(Hindi/Bollywood) Rating:  *  * ½ This sequel is a brand extension really - a series of ‘item’ numbers choreographed to appeal to your baser instincts, interspersed with typically unrealistic and over-punctuated stunts leading up to a climactic showdown that doesn’t even make an effort to be half-way believable.

 
Rise of the Guardians(English/Hollywood) Rating: *  *  * Based on William Joyce's series of children's books. A group of mythical fairy-tale characters team up to save the world .Santa Claus, Tooth Fairy,Jack Frost,Easter Bunny and their ilk fight it out with bogeyman in an avengers like mythical animated fantasy.  It’s gorgeously designed, deftly written, funny and just a little bit scary too.




Dabangg 2, Bollywood Hindi Film Review, Johnson Thomas, Rating: * * 1/2

$
0
0




Hindi Film Review
Johnson Thomas
 
Stunt-ed  Sequel

Film: Dabangg 2
Cast:  Salman Khan, Sonakshi Sinha, Vinod Khanna, Arbaaz Khan, Prakash Raj
Director: Arbaaz Khan

Rating: *  *  ½

The ‘writing ‘ was on the wall- ‘Dabangg 2’ had nowhere to go but downhill with the  helmer/ideator  of the first, Abhinav Kashyap, well out of the picture. So as expected , the sheer rambunctiousness of the first is missing, the chutzpah and dynamism of the ‘70’s flavoured story doesn’t even exist –instead what you get in this sequel is a brand extension really - a series of ‘item’ numbers choreographed to appeal to your baser instincts, interspersed with typically unrealistic and over-punctuated stunts leading up to a climactic showdown that doesn’t even make an effort to be half-way believable.
If ‘Dabangg’ had Zandu balm to cure you of the rigours of sitting through it’s highly stylised unabashed conventionalism, ‘Dabangg 2’ uses Fevicol to keep you rooted through a two hour plus  runtime of assorted masala movements. The approach in the second is entirely different from the first. And that was to be expected with Arbaaz Khan taking over the direction and  Dilip Shankar sitting in on the creative.
The story is non-existent. The plot is basically a facile extension of the first. Chulbul Pandey(Salman khan) moves bag, baggage, family and his robin-hood like operations to Kanpur, another hotbed of crime. Even before he can get introduced to his defeatist colleagues he solves a kidnapping case and gets the booty invested in a charitable fund. After a few more such manoeuvres he confronts a sibling of the biggest crime boss cum politician in the city and wins that battle too. So the stage is set for some counter attacks leading up to the final showdown. 

 

The lack of even a semblance of a story is galling. The characterisations are even more caricatured. It’s quite clear that there was no script to power this project and sheer greed can only take it so far. Even the central character of Chulul Pandey loses it’s sheen while becoming more Salman like in the process .Note Chulbul’s interactions with the media, his establishment of a Chulbul Pandey charitable fund and his ‘dadagiri’over his family and you will realise that this film is actually trying to present the real Salman. The lines between the reel and the real have almost disappeared. The Image and the reality have merged. It’s a kind of psychophancy that only  desperation can bring about. After all Arbaaz’s career as a hero was going nowhere. Salman’s attempt to shore up his brother’s  career by making him a producer for the first film backfired in a way because Abhinav Kashyap walked away with all the praise and accolades. So the only way that Arbaaz could find redemption was by taking over the helming. And that he did but the handicap of losing the chief ideator was not easy to overcome. And since there was no real inspirational idea behind the sequel , Arbaaz and team just expanded the concept making it look more like ‘Singham.’  With Prakash Raj essaying the role of Baccha Bhai, the chief villain in this film, the similarities were one too many..
This film unlike the first, basically tries overly hard to cash in on Salman’s star power. Every scene is intent on making Salman look good to the extent that even the action is unreal- choreographed more on the editing table than in real time.  The gun fights are in fact the worst that we’ve seen in a long time. The villains shoot away to glory but the hero never gets hit. In fact there are scenes in the film where the hero advances without weapons while the villains are fully armed or shooting at him. There’s no attempt to make anything look real. It’s a kind of obverse egoistical fantasy that bends all the rules of the game in order to let the hero come up trumps. The attempt to lend Salman Khan a mystique similar to the one Rajnikanth enjoys in the south is appreciable but not creditable.

 
The only somewhat original aspect in this film is it’s tone which is playful throughout even during the fiercest of battles. And Salman must be credited for making it stick through all the segmented action sequences and the musical parade of dance numbers. The humour is not as punchy as the first but it manages to lighten the mood but not enough to overlook all the inadequacies.  Aseem Mishra and Mahesh Limaye wield their cameras with loving efficiency- from making a statuesque Sonakshi look delectable to giving the fevicol number picturised on Kareena an earthy  senuousness and vigour. In fact the fevicol number is by far Kareena’s best item number performance. She seems to have abandoned her inhibitions and looks and moves like a woman well-assured of her own sexiness.  Malaika’s presence in another number extends the Munni mystique a bit. The  acting  in such films is not meant to have any long-standing effect and as such it’s a decent attempt by all players. Everyone seems to be in it to play the game of continuity. Even resplendent in all these masala elements ‘Dabangg 2’ doesn’t manage to entertain completely. Arbaaz helms this movie like  he wanted to make a ‘Singham’ not a ‘Dabangg’ and therein lies it’s biggest failure. The frolic may be there but the fun is elsewhere!
Hindi Film Review
Johnson Thomas

Film: Dabangg 2
Cast: Salman Khan, Sonakshi Sinha, Arbaaz Khan, Vinod Khanna
Director: Arbaaz Khan

Rating: *  *  ½
 
If ‘Dabangg’ was a richly flavoured and sumptuous biryani then ‘Dabangg 2’ in comparison pales into  a relatively uncooked dal khichdi . Such is the treatment meted out to this sequel which had it’s origins in Abhinav Kashyap’s  stylishly conceptualised  ‘70’s  blockbuster semi-parody.  While Abhinav Kashyap’s effort had a story and a nicely delineated script with punchy dialogues and distinctive mannerisms, this one , helmed by Arbaaz, just plays to the gallery.

‘Dabangg 2’ is merely an attempt to capitalise on a brand that is talked about with a great deal of reverence in Box-office circles. There is no taking the story forward or to a new high, here. It merely expands the game, shifting it to a new location, Kanpur,  with a new batch of villains –Bachcha Singh(Prakash Raj) replacing Chedi Singh, and almost the same silliness but without the intelligence that made the first one garner it’s cult following. So Chulbul Pandey(Salman Khan) is relocated to Kanpur with his assorted relatives- a wife Rajjo(Sonakshi Sinha), a step-father(Vinod Khanna) and a step brother (Arbaaz Khan) . It’s mainly Chubul Pandey’s play here and the assorted characters hovering around him are merely there to provide emotional back-up. 
After a bit of back story, the narrative  sets out to establish Chulbul’s superman/cop credentials in the city of Kanpur. A few successes later he is pitted against a gangster/politician Bachcha Singh (Prakash Raj) and thereafter it’s about their showdown which after a feew dance numbers and sstray action set-pieces moves to the finale.
There is no story to tell as such. The script appears to be completely missing and Salman appears to be playing Chulbul entirely from memory, interweaving his own unique characteristics into that of the cult hero. There is a fair bit of humour in the enactment but the punch lines are missing . Salman uses his mannerisms and unique dialogue delivery style to good effect . The songs and dances keep the playful mood going. But it’s never really enough to completely engage the senses. Without a story the film appears to be cobbled together without any purpose other than to pit the playful Good-cop against the archetypal villain and allow the triumph of the  righteous. The camerawork by Aseem Mishra and Mahesh Limaye is quite flattering to the star and his cohorts. The music is also quite affecting. The dance choreography though looks a trifle repetitive. There is nothing new to sell here. Fevicol replaces Zandu balm,  Kareena does a raunchy item number and Munni(Malaika) also gets a brief shoo-in in a dance but the assorted masala doesn't appear well-co-rdinated. What you buy into here is another dose of Salman antics and it’s something the hoi-polloi never tires of. 
 
This movie has a dual purpose –to glorify Salman and expand his box-office clout and give Arbaaz a sounder footing at a career in films, albeit as a director-producer. And both it will achieve not because they merit it but because the viewing public are not discriminating enough about the kind of fare they are subjected to.

Rise of the Guardians, Hollywood English Film review, Johnson Thomas, Rating: * * *

$
0
0


 


English film Review
Johnson Thomas

Film: Rise of The Guardians
Cast(voices):Chris Pine, Hugh Jackman, Jude Law, Alec Baldwin, Isla Fisher
Director: Peter A. Ramsey

Rating: *  *  *
 
Synopsis: A group of mythical fairy-tale characters team up to save the world in this DreamWorks Animation production. Based on William Joyce's series of children's books, the pic features the voice-acting talents of Chris Pine, Hugh Jackman, Alec Baldwin, Jude Law, and Isla Fisher.

 

Rise of the Guardians(English/Hollywood) Rating: *  *  * Based on William Joyce's series of children's books. A group of mythical fairy-tale characters team up to save the world .Santa Claus, Tooth Fairy,Jack Frost,Easter Bunny and their ilk fight it out with bogeyman in an avengers like mythical animated fantasy.  It’s gorgeously designed, deftly written, funny and just a little bit scary too.



Loosely adapted by playwright and occasional screenwriter David Lindsay-Abaire from the book series "Guardians of Childhood" by William Joyce and the Reel FX short film "The Man in the Moon" directed by Joyce this film tries overly hard to be a magical experience but falls just short because of it’s aggressive efforts to sell the idea so to speak. We in India are not so familiar.with this story so the novelty value is high and watching our favourite bedtime characters Guardians all, include North (voiced by Alec Baldwin), a well-built, Slavic-accented Santa; Bunny (Hugh Jackman), who turns every Easter into a most egg-cellent holiday; Tooth (Isla Fisher), who relies on her pint-sized minions to swap coins for incisors; and the mute but oh-so-eloquent Sandy, whose golden pixie dust ensures the sweetest of dreams- team –up in a avengers sort of line-up against the ominous evil of Pitch Black(Jude Law) , the Bogeyman who wants to obliterate all the good in the world and ensure darkness reigns supreme.
 By way of a strange lunar prophecy, winter sprite Jack Frost (Chris Pine) joins their ranks and saves the day, but springtime-loving Bunny, is not amused by the new choice for Guardianship.  The  premise centered around a secret circle of supernatural gift-givers tasked with protecting the children of the world from darkness and despair is interesting enough and so is it’sthe colourful, charming, hyperactive  narrative. The frames are beautiful composed , the animation is as near a work of art ,you can get in the cinemas and the 3d and thrill elements are quite exciting. It’s the numerous characters in this outing that makes for a bit of disenchantment. The narrative goes a bit haywire trying o incorporate everyone’s stories and when the time comes to fight Pitch black it almost comes too late. The visuals are stunning and the fantasy is peddled with robust efficiency. The voicing is also in high order. But kids could still find it difficult to cotton on because Pitch black appears a bit too scary and powerful for a pre-teen audience.

Picks and Piques/Snippet Revf films released on 28th Dec 2012, Johnson Thomas

$
0
0


Picks and Piques/Snippet Reviews of Films released on 28 Dec 2012

 
Hansa(Hindi) Rating:  *  *  * An obscure but idyllic Himalayan village , a handful of characters struggling to maintain their dignity amidst turmoil and tribulations is what lends credence and potency to this heart-warming coming-of-age story. The strong narrative and the  empathetic performances add to the enchantment.

 
Jack Reacher(English) Rating: *  ½ Tom Cruise is completely out of tune with the character Jack Reacher and his essaying falls way short of the 6 foot plus lone wolf ex MP that Lee imagined for his pulp hero.. He looks out of sorts in a film that is severely hampered by low-fuel stunts, a lengthy exposition that has little of worth to express and terrible performances. Even the masterstroke of casting Werner Herzog as the Zek  and havinf Robert Duvall in a cameo doesn’t do much for the engagement.  Lee Child’s fiction deserved a better deal than this for sure!

Hansa, Hindi Film review, Johnson Thomas, Rating: * * *

$
0
0








Hindi Film review
Johnson Thomas
Simply, Enchanting
Film: Hansa
Cast: Kumud Mishra, Trimala Adhikari, ashish Kumar, Abhay Joshi
Director: Manav Kaul

Rating:  *  *  *
 
The Himalayan township of Kumaon is the setting for this simple yet enchanting tale – a journey that encapsulates enigma and mystery while touching the lives of a family thrown adrift following the sudden abandonment by the head of the family. So  it’s up to  the young son and his friend,  a pregnant wife, and a daughter  to embattle the negative forces that prey on their susceptible vulnerabilities.
It’s a tough life in the little obscure Himalayan village for a family without it’s male head  and the protagonists have to all but survive through the hardships, anguish and pain  while losing their youth, innocence and exposing their vulnerabilities in the process. The seemingly simple narrative delves deep into the lives of it.’s two main protagoniusts Hansa and Cheeku while shadowing their transformations caused by circumstances beyond their control.

 

The picturesque Himalayan village is getting caught up in a tourism boom. With more and more tourists visiting the countryside the lives of it’s inhabitants are  coming under risk. Cheeku( Trimala Adhikari), the young girl of seventeen, is the oldest and faces the burden of  searching for her father while battling the other sharks that  are waiting for a chance to pounce on her property, youth and beauty.  An unscrupulous rich villager Bijju Da(Kumud Mishra) eyes her as a possible conquest  and a local lawyer cum wannabe  real estate developer Lohni( also hand-in-glove with Bijju Da)  wants the land surrounding her home to build a resort for tourists. Her younger brother Hansa (Suraj)is seemingly oblivious to the turmoil that has ridden their peaceful existence, engaged as he is in playing silly pranks with his best buddy. But hardships and struggles are not all they have to face as their lives take a bizarre turn in the course of just one week. Displacement and Dispossession loom large so will the family let go it’s dignity and plough among the sharks while plotting to hold on to their foothold?

 
The narrative is visually enchanting while retaining a deceptive simplicity in the recitation of the tale of survival that the embattled family engages in. The cinematography by Sachin Kabir lends strength and depth to the story of innocence countermanded by the travails of rural existence. The greed, lust and power politics of village life are exposed in starkly realistic terms while  the focus on the main plot and characters thereof  is retained throughout.  Hansa’s coming of age is juxtaposed beautifully with the disintegration of a tranquil and once peaceful village. The gloom and doom central to the plot is succinctly kept at bay by the heart-warming coming-of-age story.  Veteran theatre director Manav Kaul makes a strong statement against human avariciousness with  this his wonderfully evocative debut film. The tempo may not be upbeat but the mood  is strongly constructed and the momentum is quite elegantly laid out.The  performances are superb. Even the non-actors like Suraj and his friend have done a wonderfully befitting job. Hansa may not have the artifice and masala that renders crass entertainment but within it’s simplistic confines provides a thought-provoking dramaturgy that is far more profound and unforgettable than the commercially successful BO bonanzas we have been treated to of yore. This then is a film worthy of a visit to even the farthest of cinemas. Watch it and you will be enchanted!

Jack Reacher,Hollywood English Film Review, Johnson Thomas, Rating: * 1/2

$
0
0





 


English Film Review
Johnson Thomas
Short-shifted
Film: Jack Reacher
Cast:Tom Cruise, Rosamund Pike, Robert Duvall, Werner Herzog, Richard Jenkins, David Oyelowo, Jai Courtney, Michael Raymond-James, Josh Helman
Director:Christopher McQuarrie


Rating: * 1/2

 Jack Reacher Movie
Synopsis:The Usual Suspects' Christopher McQuarrie brings Lee Child's Jack Reacher character to the big screen with this Paramount...Pictures production starring Tom Cruise as the lone-wolf investigator on the hunt for a murderous sniper. Robert Duvall, Richard Jenkins, Rosamund Pike, and director Werner Herzog co
The attempt to latch on to yet another franchisee for long term success was clearly the reason why Tom Cruise latched on to this bandwagon but Director Christopher McQuarrie’s intentions for casting him in the lead which required a 6’4 inch hunk is certainly questionable. Especially since Tom Cruise despite his star power looks and acts totally unsuitable for the part. 

 
This relatively generic attempt based on Lee Child's bestselling suspenser "One Shot" has Reacher  as a brawny action figure whose exploits would have been a good fits for the action superstars of yore – even a Liam Neeson , despite his age could have done better justice than a Tom Cruise yet the Producers and Directors cast him in the lead and entrust their film with a handicap that is way too tall to overcome.  
The surprise casting of Werner Herzog as the Zec and the rarely seen veteran Robert Duvall are surprises all right but they don’t lend any more believability to a movie already laid low by inappropriate casting. Even Rosamund Pike appears a misfit as an attorney who takes up a losing proposition.
Det. Emerson (David Oyelowo,) nabs the suspect, and the D.A. (Richard Jenkins) is ready to convict. The prosecutor’s  legal-eagle daughter Helen (Rosamund Pike) picks this seemingly impossible opportunity to go head-to-head with her Dad in court by defending Barr.


Reacher is a "ghost" a mysterious character, a drifter  without a drivers license or possessions-  an ex-military inspector whose appearance at the scene of  crime  is because he has taken an oath to root out all evil. The evil here is Barr (Joseph Sikora)who apparently has shot six random people and after being caught, beaten and hospitalised, has asked for Reacher to be called upon.
Once Reacher gets into the picture, the evidence is re-read and the signs show a possibility of someone else having committed the crime. 

 
Writer-director Christopher McQuarrie's challenge lies in making the a short n snappy  Cruise look and fit into the six-footer big build Reacher of Child’s creation. But it’s a tough ask and doesn’t get fulfilled even for a bit.  The book was a guilty pleasure read  and  McQuarrie tries hard to make his film look different but that too comes a cropper. The set –up is quite  uneven and heavy-handed , the characters are clichés t best and the only thing that relieves is the terirific camerawork by Caleb Duschamel. Even the action is too sporadic to satisfy. Lee Child fan’s are not going to be happy of this desecration!

Picks and Piques/Snippet Reviews of Films released 4th Jan 2013

$
0
0




Picks and Piques/Snippet Reviews of Films released 4thJan 2013

 
Table No 21(Hindi) Rating:   *  *  ½   A smartly put-together gamey thriller. Could have done better with a little more tension. 

 

The Impossible(English): Rating: *  *  * ½ “Prepare to be shalken and stirred by this heart-wrenching true story. This film  centres on the events of December 26, 2004, when a series of giant tidal waves killed over 200,000 people across multiple South Asian territories. This second feature from the Spanish director Juan Antonio Bayona, marries digital imagery, superb sound design and spiffy editing  to recreate both the violence of unleashed waters and the desolation that followed their assault. It’s the best disaster movie to hit the screens after a long time!

 
CZ(Chinese Zodiac)12(English) Rating:  *  * ½  Jackie Chan is back reprising his ‘Armour nof God ‘ series with some solid kick-ass action but given his age(50 plus) it’s all a bit too unbelievable

 

Rajdhani Express(Hindi) Rating: *  No speed, no thrills, just a botched up series of events . Leander goes the way of others from his ilk.

Table No 21, Hindi Bollywood Film review, Johnson Thomas, Rating: * * 1/2

$
0
0



 



Hindi Film Review
Johnson Thomas

Gamey Experience
 
Film: Table No 21
Cast: Paresh Rawal, Rajeev Khandelwal, Tena Desae
Director: Aditya Datt

Rating: *  * ½


 Live Game show movies have been trending on the Bollywood  firmament these past few years but none have been able to generate the kind of frenzy that watching one on TV does. It’s probably the default belief that in cinema nothing could be truly Live. It’s after all fantasy constructed to make it look live.  Unfortunately the films that have been part of this genre have not been able to be convincing in that regard.   After a string of failures(Will you Marry me?, Aashiq banaya Aapne, Good luck, Dil Diya Hai) Aditya Datt comes up with a gamey thriller –one which has a  ‘ live’ game show concept as it’s plot-boiler and a cause celebre at it’s heart.  Aditya’s film is not exactly ‘original’in this regard because it comes after the crudely manufactured Ravi Kissen starrer ‘Chitkabrein’ and looks more like an middle-market version of the same. The star of the show here is undoubtedly Paresh Rawal, the consummate actor who can get into any shoe and look completely convincing. And here he does a mean job of it. With Rajeev Khandelwal and Tena(Best Exotic Marigold Hotel) Desae playing the couple in the ‘Sach ka Samna’ like   hot-seat, this film , on face value alone , has much more audience lure than it’s crude predecessor.  
 
We’ve seen many Game show thriller attempts come a cropper in Bollywood but thankfully Aditya Datt’s film is not one among them. It’s slicker, well thought out,(even though there are quite a few cinematic liberties taken),, smartly constructed,  well-enacted and also propounds a cause that has been mostly trivialised  by our typical bollywood ian fantasies. This film, though it uses it’s background score quite liberally to drum up mood and tension, has a smartly developed set-up and strong development before it plays out it’s hand as a bleeding heart cause crier.
At the onset we are treated to a pronouncement- Article 21 and the Right to Life enshrined in our constitution. What’s the connection you may well question and the answer doesn’t come to you till the very end. So the curiosity level is high right at the outset. It’s not a race like ‘Death race,’ It’s in fact a game of truth with all the devices that ensure you are playing the game with sincerity and economy. 
 

A middle-class couple Vivaan (Rajeev Khandelwal) and Siya Agasthi (Tena Desae) win a holiday to Fiji and find opportunity to earn the fastest crore by beng inveigled to play on a game show which has it’s faithful minions on the internet. Siya is the only earning member of the two and so it’s imperative for Vivaan to start living up to his manly responsibilities. So they are easily suckered into the game-Table No 21- with seven stages and Rs 21 crores at stake and the only rules are that they cannot get out of it till it concludes and they must tell the truth always to win and stay alive. If you lie you die. The game plays on , the degree of difficulty increases gradually and the back story keeps coming to us in intermittent strands. There’s of course a solid plan behind the non-linear narrative spiel. The couple have a history that they must face up to and it’s not pretty at the end.
All the three leads have shades of grey. No one is totally innocent or above board. Mr Khan (Paresh Rawal) the  game show host is sinister and consummate in his role as the judge and jury in a show that has high stakes on both sides. Vivaan and Siya , after five years of marriage and five years of courtship prior to that , suddenly find themselves in deep water as the truth about their true charac ters  and teenage indiscretions get revealed piecemeal as the game progresses.  The set-up, exposition and development are quite well-knitted but the climax just appears a bit forced. Of course there’s predictability also affecting the end result. But helmer Aaditya appears to have learnt well from his earlier mistakes. He keeps his aces hidden and strews his clues along the narrative path with premeditated economy, allowing for a strong build-up; The background score is loud and drums up a torrent of fake tension which seeps into the narrative constructs and blends in quite effectively. So the experience is just a bit heart-felt and you do feel slightly empathetic towards the hapless victims of this sinister vengeance driven game. Aditya Datt’s movie may not be a great experience but it certainly gets you involved and keeps you entertained for most of it’s short and sweet 110 min run time.

Rajdhani Express, hindi Bollywood Film Review, Johnson Thomas, Rating: *

$
0
0


 



Hindi Film Review
Johnson Thomas

De-railed Thriller

Film: Rajdhani Express
Cast: Leander Paes, Sudhanshu Pandey, Priyanshu Chatterjee, Jimmy Shergill, Sayali Bhagat, Kiran Kumar, Puja,
Director: Ashok Kohli

Rating: * 


It seemed like a fetching idea-to dramatise events on a superfast train , engineering thriller constructs to ensure mass engagement but the execution of it , the trickiest part, is what makes it count. ‘Rajdhani Express’ lacks that finesse. It’s like  a runaway train with no destination . 

 
Leander Paes ‘ big break into Bollywood is not as smashing as his  Tennis court heroics. Like most sportsmen turned actors he also appears to have limited durability on the big screen. Salim Durrani, Gavaskar, Sandeep Patil, Salil Ankola, Sreesanth have all done it and failed so one wonders why Leander thought he would fare any different. This may have been a career move  attempted to stem the tide of his waning tennis court influence  but it doesn’t look like the right one( for him). Leander has neither the looks nor the acting ability to make it stick on the big screen. He may have been a fighter on court with a never say die attitude , thus ensuring his longevity in the sport  but on screen his long-stay capabilities will entirely be dependent on the audience and his Bollywood benefactors. And going by his debut performance it’s likely to be a no-show on all fronts.


 
‘Rajdhani Express’ may have started out as a great idea, with an ‘A Wednesday ‘ like concept but the execution doesn’t really live up to  those haloed expectations. The script is as faulty as they come and the narration doesn’t have any inkling of where it’s going while the performances are so put-on and exasperating that you just want to shut them up. So what exactly does the film have that will keep you entertained? Nothing really. Even curiosity about Leander’s ability as an actor can only take you as far as the opening credits. The minute he opens his mouth and shows some expression you know it’s a slippery court out there and the game is really not being played to his liking.

The Director/scriptwriter Ashok Kohli’s intentions are not very clear. The four characters from different professions and walks-of-life  central to the plot, meeting –up in a Rajdhani Express  enroute to Mumbai from Delhi, and the mess-up that happens thereafter is hard  to digest. When the provocative woman in the cabin decides to enrol the male members in a game of ‘what’s my profession’  it’s like having something uninteresting shovelled down your throat.  In fact the treatment is just a little too loose  and shoddy to generate interest. The editing takes the narrative back and forth transcending timelines and unimportant   threads of plot which any sensible filmmaker would have omitted in the final cut.
Keshav(Leander) is an orphan who has been sexually abused a s a child and is now in the employ of a small-time thug (Kiran Kumar) . Keshav has always been in love with the thug’s daughter(Sayali Bhagat) who blows hot and cold towards him in the ever shifting narrative timeline designed to keep you guessing throughout. The thug cottons on to Keshav’s secret and decides to teach him a lesson by sending him on a wild goose errand. Keshav falls for the premeditated ploy and steals into the Rajdhani Express with a bag that contains a gun and possibly a bomb.. On his journey he encounters some really curious characters- most of them unlikely to be travelling in the Rajdhani.  A fashion Designer Munish(Sudhanshu Pandey), a Bengali writer P C Bannerjee (Priyanshu Chatterjee) , a promiscuous Bollywood Item girl Sunita( Puja Bose) , a Mukhya(Chief) Ticket collector Satyam Sharma(Gulshan Grover) , a cabinet minister’s firang wife and young son and the aged parents of a state minister. We really don’t get to know why they are there and the director/writer doesn’t believe in revealing such mysteries either. It’s all been decided. Everyone has to perform to fit in to the pre-decided clichéd stereotypes  and a bomb hoax is engineered to add a little more masala. The ATS led byDeputy Commissioner of Police, Yadav(Jimmy Shergill) is called in and he has his own axe to grind. So there’s a lot of confusion wrought about and no real resolution at the end.
There probably is some symbolic meaning in the coming together of these fringe characters but it’s a missed bus at best.  None of the characters are given enough room to develop empathy so we just don’t buy into the random posturing that symbolises their acts.
Sharp editing, meaningful set-ups and a stronger narrative may have lent strength to the story that harps about how preconceived notions and misguided ideologies paint character portraits that may not be entirely true,  causing grievous harm to the  people who are thereof vilified. But the Director  doesn’t have the ability or the smarts to make  it look compelling. The loosely  non-linear pattern of the narrative that incorporates  flashbacks of the past  have little of interest and appear as speed breakers just when you expect the momentum to go a notch up further. So the pace is uneven and the tension unyielding. Incoherence is rampant as the editing gives more priority to unnecessary romantic fluff rather than shed it for greater edginess. The camerawork is shaky and unfocussed. Dont know whether it was the projection at the preview theatre or the lack of skill of the cinematographer at play here. The music is terrible. The background score lacks class and is indistinct. The performances are downright stupid. There’s neither sincerity in the performances nor in the execution. And to top it all, the pride of the railways , the Rajdhani Express , is presented in a shabby negative way. The railways will surely have to rethink about allowing Bollywood  to mess with it’s premier brand. This film is truly one long journey with no destination in sight!



The Impossible, Hollywood English movie Film review, Johnson Thomas, Rating: * * * 1/2

$
0
0





 


English Film Review
Johnson Thomas

A heart-wrecking Disaster movie

Film: The Impossible
Cast:Naomi Watts, Ewan McGregor, Tom Hollander, Geraldine Chaplin
Director:Juan Antonio Bayona
Rating:*  *  * 1/2


Synopsis: Director Juan Antonio Bayona follows up his critically-acclaimed feature debut The Orphanage with this drama set during the 2004 tsunami, and detailing one family's incredible fight for survival. Inspired by actual events, The Impossible opens on December 26th, as Henry (Ewan McGregor), his wife Maria (Naomi Watts), and their three sons lounge poolside following an eventful Christmas. But just as the family begins to forget their troubles and settle in for a relaxing tropical getaway, one of the worst natural disasters in modern history changes their lives in the blink of an eye. Meanwhile, as shock gives way to abject horror, the devoted parents fight to protect their children, encountering scenes heart-wrenching tragedy and experiencing acts of incredible compassion as the entire country of Thailand is engulfed in chaos.

 
The most traumatic disaster in natural history is brought  centre stage for the first time on the cinema screen, Clint Eastwood’s ‘Hereafter’ had a brief interlude about it but the true experience of the disastrous Tsunami that buried alive thousands in it’s wake comes from , ‘The Impossible.’ A true story finds dramatic heft in epic scale thanks to Spanish helmer J.A.Bayana who manages to re-capture the event with spectacular dynamics  and swell imagery. The December 2004 Tsunami that torpedoed the Indian Ocean into a giant wave that swept through several nations killing several thousands of year ending revellers has been caught on screen with a raw intensity and vivid detail. It’s a big show calamity alright but there’s also a heart-touching upliftment that restores faith in humanity. 
 

‘The Impossible’refers to the extraordinary feat of the  Belon family, vacationing in Thailand in December 2004, who managed to weather the deadliest catastrophe in the country's history. Sergio G. Sanchez's bare bones screenplay (with a story credited to surviving wife and mother Maria Belon) allows the inherent drama to be real rather than imagined.  Every frame is geared towards telling the life-threatening story in faithful, unadorned terms.  ,
British-born businessman Henry Bennett (Ewan McGregor) and his doctor wife, Maria (Naomi Watts), arrive at a Thai beach resort with their three boys on Christmas Eve, soaking in the atmosphere when disaster strikes. Enormous walls of water separate Maria and oldest son Lucas (Tom Holland) from Henry and the two younger boys, Thomas (Samuel Joslin) and Simon (Oaklee Pendergast). Lucas and a badly injured Maria manage to steady themselves by clinging to a branch and  eventually find their way to dry land. The narrative details every sound and expression with almost unbearable deliberation. 
 
The 98 foot high tidal wave  generated by the Tsunami is  reconstructed in superbly  vivid and  staggering fashion . If you’ve seen the Discovery channel footage of the real thing then you’ll realise that this one comes as close as one can get to the real thing. And on big screen with Dolby digital sound enhancing the horror of that event, seeing people flung about, battered ,bruised and swept away alongside debris, cars and other hard material – it’s just extraordinary.  It’s merely a ten minute sequence but the impact is unforgettable. The story follow Maria’s perspective diligently and makes it more of a personal tragedy that turns into a triumph. . 
 

The Tsunami sequence was supposedly shot in Thailand and Spain using seamlessly integrated Fx. Seeing Maria flung and pounded repeatedly like a rubber doll by muddy water and vicious debris is simply harrowing. Collaborating again following  their 2007 debut feature, "The Orphanage," Bayona and Sanchez  make this one even more impactful. The intimacy developed from following one family into disaster and back gives it an easy audience connect and allows for instant relatability.  TV news footage is  minimal. The performances are superb. Watts is supreme and so are her co-stars in this epoch making tragedy. The film is technically sound. The effects are spectacular , the experience is stunning and the performances are heart-wrenching. This is a film that gets all the disaster mechanics right  Every orchestrated moment in the film resonates like a thunder-clap  Fernando Velazquez operatic score lends suspense, mystery and drama to the lost and found trajectory of the story. The second half which features the search for each other and the final coming together does smack of cinematic manipulation but it’s all to the good of the experience. This is one disaster movie that is going to be ‘impossible’ to forget!

CZ 12, Hollywood English Film review, Johnson Thomas, Rating: * * 1/2

$
0
0



 



English Film reviews
Johnson Thomas

Action is the Key
 
Film: CZ (Chinese Zodiac ) 12
Cast: Jackie Chan, Kwan Sang-Woo, Liao Fan, Zhang Lanxin, Yao Xingtong, Laura Weissbecker, Yoo Sung-Joo, Amedeo Rosario, Alaa Safi, Vincent Sze, Caitlin Dechelle, Chen Bo Lin, Jonathan Lee, Ken Lo, Oliver Platt
Director: Jackie Chan




Rating:  *  * ½

Jackie Chan is at it again. Fighting his way into yet another action extravaganza designed to make him look good. Mind you, it’s not as good as he was in his heyday but nevertheless given the slowing down that is a given after 50, he still manages to throw in some mean kicks and punches and elude the evil men and women just as irreverently. 
 
 Jackie Chan plays JC, a thief for hire, operating with a crew (Zhang Lanxin, Kwone Sang-Woo, and Liao Fan) and often posing as a National Geographic journalist. They are assigned, by an unscrupulous auction house to steal the bronze heads of the Chinese Zodiac statues, which in the late 19th century sat pretty in a Chinese palace already demolished by the invading Western forces. Off he goes jet-setting round the globe to recover these artifacts   only to be waylaid  by a group of well meaning lobbyists whose objective is to convince owners of any antiques and national treasures, to return them to where they rightfully belong
 
This one is probably his 101stfilm following ‘1911’ and there’s a visible slowdown involved in both making and producing movies as well as enacting stunts and comedy which are his usual trademarks. The risks are fewer , the degree of difficulty in the stunts much lower by his own standards and the increase in drama or story as compensation doesn’t do much to improve his sagging brand value.  In this film Jackie Chan is probably the whole and soul of the film.
He is involved in almost  every department of the filmmaking process here including producing, directing, writing, lensing, deciding on art direction, and the list goes on. So camouflaging his age related disabilities(in terms of stunts) is much easier but more obvious. The funnyman in him is also not as effective as the timing is just off and the dialogues have lost their tickle-worth. But when compared to others of his ilk, Jackie Chan is still king . He still manages to get around without resorting to weapons and unsavoury brutality. His has always been  a straightforward  good versus evil fight and it continues in CZ12 .

.

Wire work and CG are modern cinema associations which he cant do without now. It’s foolish to be expecting him to continue risking his life doing high risk stunts for audience satisfaction. This film may not have Jackie Chan at his best but it definitely has Jackie Chan at his most creative. For Chan fans, it’s yet another reason to venerate their action hero!

Picks and piques/Snippet reviews of Films Released on 11th Jan 2013 /Johnson Thomas

$
0
0


Picks and piques/Snippet reviews of Films Released on 11th Jan 2013 /Johnson Thomas

 
Matru Ki Bijlee Ka Mandola( Hindi) : Rating: *  *   Vishal Bharadwaj’s worst ever. This film dances to strange tunes when supposedly rooted to the soil. A weird and completely odd-ball bunch of characters inhabit this dramedy that is woefully lacking in humour and taste!

 
Gangoobai(Hindi)Rating:*  * ½ But for Sarita Joshi’s endearing presence this film wouldn’t even have rated a mention.

 
Gangster Squad(English) Rating: *  *  *  this week’s best bet, a gangster flick reminiscent of  Brian De Palma’s ‘The Untouchables,’ but obviously not in the same class. This vigilante cops Vs Mafia don Mickey Cohen, set in Los Angeles, is colourful, slick, smart, supremely stylish and just a little over-the-top. 

 
Ajinkya(Marathi) Rating: *  *  *  about a basketball coach and his ambitions coming in the way of his married life, this one is heart-touching with it’s rooted to reality takes and sports movie touch downs.

Matru Ki Bijlee Ka Mandola, Hindi Bollywood Film Review, Johnson Thomas, Rating: * *

$
0
0







Hindi Film Review
Johnson Thomas

Odd-Ball gimmicks that come unstuck

 

Film; Matru ki Bijlee Ka Mandola
Cast: Imran Khan, Anushka Sharma, Shabana Azmi, Pankaj Kapoor, Arya Babbar
Director: Vishal Bharadwaj

Rating:   *  *

The audience expectations were high. Theatre owners were anxious for a new product that could corner the audience fancy after ‘Dabangg 2’ . Coming three weeks after the Salman Khan starrer’s release, ‘Matru Ki Bijlee Ka Mandola’ was expected to save the blushes of the Multiplex community after the  no-show of  Kamal Hassan’s ‘Vishwaroopam. ’ But that’s not going to happen because ‘Matru..’ is an insipid, crazy and crude attempt at weirdly compelling(Emir Kusturica) which comes unstuck in the first few frames itself.  Inspiration is all very well but when you don’t have a worthy subject or weighty characters to plough your borrowed path then all you have is a damp squib.


 
 Vishal Bharadwaj appears to have touched the nadir of his creativity, from ‘Kaminey’ to ‘Saat Khoon Maaf’ and now ‘Matru Ki..”  he has touched rock bottom in terms of subject, style, content, language, music , lyrics and performances. The latest in his inconsistent oeuvre(which includes gems like The Blue umbrella and Omkara), ‘Matru Ki Bijlee ka Mandola’ has a folksy blend of African and Indian rhythms pulsing along side a narrative that goes haywire in it’s clueless attempt to manufacture  comedy out of linguistic euphemisms associated with the mass versus class struggle. The language central to this peasant offence is Haryanvi-a dialect that will in all likelihood be unfamiliar to most of India. After the first few words, the romance of a new lingua is also over because beyond a point it’s not clearly understandable  even to those who understand Hindi. So the chances of this film striking a chord anywhere in India (other than Haryana)  is zilch.
The film opens with two drunks in a white stretch limousine crashing through a desi liquor shop deep within the Haryanvi countryside. It’s a stupid  attempt to sign in with a Tarantinoesque flurry and the foolishness is all too apparent. Why would a land baron, filthy rich owner of a Palatial Haveli with enough liquor in  it’s coffers, have to resort to such atrocious grandstanding ? Only Abhishek Chaubey and Vishal Bharadwaj  can tell I guess. Hukum Singh Matru(Imran Khan) is the driver cum lawyer from the peasantry while Harry Mandola is the richest landlord in Mandola village  consisting of verdant farmland that Harry and his cohort –the Chief Minister Chaudhary Devi(Shabana Azmi) plans to grab in order to transform the rustic rural landscape to one of glass walled towers and retail plazas. It’s a given that the underhand income would touch the skies so-to-speak. 
 

The set-up is weak and unedifying. There’s little logic to support any of the actions and the characters are drawn from fantasy rather than reality. In fact it’s clear from this film that Vishal Bharadwaj is totally clueless about Indian politics and Politicos. Why else would he show a Chief Minister consorting with a local Baron throughout the movies runtime?  Not only does she seem to have time only to get this one project underway, she also appears to be spending a lot of time  suggestively enamoured by Harry. There’s in fact not a single scene showing her at Work in her office of State. The ill-concieved sequence showing her in a boardroom has her passing just one file with her son and her small coterie in attendance. There is absolutely no logical build-up to the manufactured conflict or it’s subsequent resolution. Harry is supposedly two-faced. He is a benevolent master given to largesse when drunk while sobriety lends him a cruel, Machiavelli that has the peasants up in arms. Matru who is the man in the know also doubles up as ‘Mao’ the  leader of the peasants who springs an uprising to defeat his lord and benefactor’s plans for the  farm lands. The travails of agriculture, forced urbanisation, land grabbing, compensation, loss of livelihood and sustainabilty certainly deserved a strong cinematic statement  but Bharadwaj doesn’t have anything much to say in his quirky dramatisation. And therefore makes a mockery, trivialising an issue that has affected thousand s of peasants in modern India.
Matru Ki Bijlee Ka Mandolais Bhardwaj’s  attempt at a  political film tackling political corruption and capitalist greed. The political posturing thereof is just that and doesn’t achieve any high notes. The humour is non-existent for most of the time save for one or two surprising ticklers that fade away soon enough in a monster of uncertain quips.
Bhardwaj and Chaubey may have had certain ambitions while scripting this dead-pan monster but it’s not very clear to the viewer. It’s  an intended comedy that is so farcical and weird that it’s really not laughable. The characters , all quirky , are not rooted in the earth . Though they supposedly  belong to Haryana they do not have any understanding of the mores or culture of the state. Anushka Sharma’s Bijlee- daughter of Harry Mandola, is ridiculous to say the least. She wears hot-pants and dunks herself in  village pools just so that she can get to a ball , while the whole village hangs around salivating . Bijlee is no traditionalist and has a will of her own for most of the film until her father decides to marry her off to the dumb-bum Badal (Arya Babbar)  the  witless son of Chaudhary Devi. Then she is weepy, docile and actually waits for Matru to storm in at the nth moment and rescue her from a fate equal to death.  Her romance with Matru also reeks of convenience  because  till half time she’s well on her way to hitching her choli to Badal’s suit. Badal , on his way back from Africa , has ‘bought’ over a tribal dance group to perform just so that he can woo Bijlee with her heart’s desire. One would think that since this troupe was Badal’s preserve he would have use for them thereafter. But Bharadwaj and company employ the members as extras aiding the Matru-Bijlee romance and the fight of the peasantry. Even continuity is a sore point in this debacle. The symbolism of a pink cow visualised in sober stupor by Harry is also lost in the maze of beer and pink desi daru aka Gulabo , that litters the narrative with  Freudian  implications. 
 
Gulzar’s lyrics are incredibly lurid, crude  and suggestive ,  Bharadway’s music borrows generously from Eastern European and African  shores, therefore  sounding out-of-sync with the run of play. The dance choreography amounting to sexually suggestive thrusts and vampy gyrations, is also quite unfit for a general audience viewing.  Chaubey and Bharadway quote liberally from Shakespeare’s ‘Macbeth’ trying hard  to instil a worth that is totally non-existent in the fake commie dramedy that is listless , purposeless , extremely tedious and expressively crude in experience. The performances are all iffy at best. Anushka saddled with  an ill-written role, tries her best to sparkle and tease but all she appears to be doing is showing off her slim-line physique .Pankaj Kapur  appears to have underplayed  Mandola to an extent where we just don’t get the hang of his characters’crucial  traits. Imran Khan is a little too prosaic and dispassionate to swing the Matru-Mao peasant leader gambit. Arya  Babbar is also saddled with a moth-eaten role of a half-wit and can make little of an impression. Shabana Azmi , though pivotal to the plot, has illogic and stupidity in the creation of her character, to overcome . She does manage to instil a spark here and there but the inevitable crash and burn at the end was to be expected. Despite having produced the film himself with his erstwhile collaborator Sabrina Dhawan as script consultant, this is by far the worst effort from Vishal Bharadwaj. This murderous assault on our innate sensibilities cannot be easily forgiven.

Gangoobai, Hindi Bollywood Film review, Johnson Thomas, Rating: * * 1/2

$
0
0





Hindi Film Review
Johnson Thomas

Simplistic fantasy

Film: Gangoobai
Cast: Sarita Joshi, Purab Kohli, Meeta Vasisht, Raj Zutshi, Gopi Desai, Rushad Rana, Nidhi Sunil, Behram Rana, Ankita Shrivastav, Aparna Khanekar
Director: Priya  Krishnaswamy 

Rating:  *  *  ½
 

After laying low for several years and trying to make do with it’s earlier laurels, NFDC, the  Government funded premier film funding body supporting talented independent filmmakers comes up with a simpleton fantasy titled ‘Gangoobai’ titled  after it’s lead character,  a middle-aged Maharashtrian maid servant  residing in the quaint hills of Matheran , who has lived her life thus far weaving dreams of wearing a Gara saree- a hand embroidered silk/chiffon saree that the Parsee community reveres as an integral part of their tradition. 


 
Fashioned as a quasi fantasy, this story is a never-say-die spirited journey of struggle and hardships encountered by Gangoobai in the effort to make her one dream come true . It’s an unbelievable tale but it has it’s innate charm in the simplistic story-telling, striking animation and measured performances.
Credibility is suspect in the dramatisation of this tale. A Maharashtrian, Gangoobai’s desire for a very Parsee  Gara is a little far-fetched. And the effort she puts in just to achieve it-including moonlighting with several menial chores and accumulating meagre earnings over  four years of hardships while denying herself food and other amenities,  is also too unbelievable. Then her visit to Mumbai to Ardra the Design store that specialises in Gara work is also handled with amateurish intent. The store’s chief designer is Rohan(Raj Zutshi) while Daksha(Meeta Vashisht) manages the clients/Store and Waman(Purab Kohli) is the accounts executive. When Gangoobai(Sarita Joshi) arrives at the store, at first she is sent away and asked to come back at six to check if there is a seat vacant for the designer’s showing of his new collection. She does the needful gets a seat and after a bit of class hysterics, chooses the showstopper as her hearts desire. She is then made to wait for days together to get her own copy and in the meantime  her goodness and presence heals a lot of lives.
 
The problem here is the incredibly naive and unaccomplished narration employed in the telling of this tale. There are continuity jerks aplenty and several of them so markedly off-putting that they are hard to overlook. The romantic triangle between Monisha(Nidhi Sunil) the design store’s top model, her on-off boyfriend (Rushab Rana) and Waman is stupidly plotted while the hint of camaraderie between Gangoobai and a wealthy old widower( Behram Rana) is also not quite convincing. In fact the lack of conviction in the plotting is the biggest hurdle here. The performances are all neatly done and Sarita Joshi, the phenom of the gujarati stage, hitherto  unsung in cinematic circles, puts on a bravura heart-felt performance that goes a long way in making this tale half-way bearable. Writer –Director Priya Krishnaswamy handles the animation sequences with ease but the rest of the narrative spiel comes across as intolerably silly.The plot is too simplistic and the elongated narrative counterproductive to an enjoyable viewing experience. If this is the kind of product that comes out of the NFDC script-Lab then there is something going wrong in the selection itself. This is certainly not the kind of film that NFDC should be associated with given it’s earlier illustrious track record.

Gangster Squad, Hollywood English Film Review, Johnson Thoimas, Rating: * * *

$
0
0


English Film Review
Johnson Thomas

Gung-Ho thriller!
 

Film: Gangster Squad
Cast:Sean Penn, Ryan Gosling, Josh Brolin, Michael Peña, Anthony Mackie, Emma Stone, Holt McCallany, Robert Patrick, Mireille Enos, Nick Nolte, Troy Garity
Director:Ruben Fleischer

Rating:  *  *  *
 
Synopsis: Sean Penn, Josh Brolin, and Ryan Gosling star in this Warner Bros. adaptation of the L.A. Times article on a squad of cops in 1940s Los Angeles whose job it was to stop East Coast Mafiosos from setting up shop in their city. Zombieland's Ruben Fleischer directs; Michael Peña, Emma Stone, Robert Patrick, and Nick Nolte 



























Review
This film inspired by real events , based on a book of the same name by Paul Lieberman, scripted for the screen  by Will Beall, is a gangster flick reminiscent of  Brian De Palma’s ‘The Untouchables,’ but obviously not in the same class. This vigilante cops Vs Mafia don Mickey Cohen dramatisation, set in Los Angeles, is colourful, slick, smart, supremely stylish and just a little over-the-top.
Set in the late 40’s , with all it’s characters donning  snazzy costumes, accompaniments and accessories, it appears to be a film more concerned about reliving the style and mood of that period rather than setting up a dark scenario of murder and violence in the city of angels. The scenario suits the gun battles with  the dialogues just as smart, witty and vacuous.
It’s 1949 and mobster Mickey Cohen (Sean Penn) is hell bent on taking over the town with his drugs and vice empire. HJe’s got the city cops in his pocket so it’s up to the few honest ones like sergeant John O'Mara (Josh Brolin)  and his small team that includes Ryan Gosling, Anthony Mackie, Robert Patrick, Michael Peña and Giovanni Ribisi,  to make an all out shoot out to death effort to shut down Cohen’s operation . As I mentioned earlier, the film has most of it’s period dating  right and the violence is profuse. Gangster Squad is slick - the action sequences are consistently gung-ho in a slightly bombastic and unreal manner . So it’s not exactly ‘The Untouchables’ even though the Director tries every trick to make us believe it is so. It’s almost as though the director wanted to transpose ‘The Untouchables’ from Chicago to Los Angeles. The scenarios are  similar with cops taking the law into their own hands in order to fight crime. Cohen is real, history has it on record but the way he is presented here appears to be romanticised rather than entirely truthful. Writer Will Beall uses some smart alecky choice repartee to keep the interest going right up there with the stylishly rendered visuals and  snazzily orchestrated gun battles.

 

 It’s a stylishly orchestrated gun fest that cares more about it’s three main leads(Sean Penn, Ryan Gosling and Josh Brolin) than it does about the rest of the characters which are no less important in the scheme of things.  Even Emma Stone who assays the gangster’s moll has little to do other than look pretty and  decorative. Even a seasoned charismatic  Nick Nolte as Chief Parker has little to do other than look gruff.
The film looks good and there’s entertainment to be had all round thanks to director of photography, Dion Beebe; editors Alan Baumgarten and James Herbert; Steve Jablonsky’s  peppy music, production design by Maher Ahmad; and fancy costumes by Mary Zophres. But this form of entertainment is limiting. It’s neither soulful nor deep enough!
Johnsont307@gmail.com





Picks and Piques /Special Edition Snippet Reviews

$
0
0


 

Picks and Piques /Special Edition Snippet Reviews

Little Big People(Documentary/English) Rating:  *  *  *  Filmmaker Khalid Mohammed's foray into documenting the big lives of little people on the streets is a heart-tugging eye-opener. The film journeys through several short segments about street children and their unassailable belief in their own talent in spite of the hardships and sufferings they endure living and surviving on the streets of Mumbai. Their never-say-die spirit shines through and the talent and spunk on display can by no means be trivialised!
 
Les Miserables(English/Musical/Feature) Rating:  *  *  * 1/2
The King's Speech's Tom Hooper directs this adaptation of Cameron Mackintosh's successful musical version of Victor Hugo's classic novel. A faithful rendering of a beloved musical, "Les Miserables" is a lavish big screen interpretation: Early 19th-century France, its squalor and ugly underbelly, the upheaval of those times  are all conveyed vividly, heightened by the raw, hungry intensity of the actors' live on camera vocals.The performances are simply captivating.

Fire in the Blood, English International Documentary film, Sundance Special, Johnson Thomas

$
0
0






Fire in the Blood, a feature-length documentary film produced by Sparkwater India, Mumbai, has been selected for the World Cinema Documentary Competition at the 2013 Sundance Film Festival, to be held January 17-23 in Park City, Utah, USA, and thus nominated for the coveted Grand Jury Prize. It is a unique achievement for an Indian film to be selected for this competitive section at what is considered to be the world's leading showcase for independent cinema.

"Sundance is the world's most prestigious platform for independent and documentary films, so for our first feature-length production to be selected is a truly immense honour", said Writer/Director/Producer Dylan Mohan Gray. "This, to the best of our knowledge, is the first documentary film of international scale and scope to come out of India, and to be chosen for the World Cinema Documentary Competition and nominated for the Grand Jury Prize out of a massive pool of submissions from talented filmmakers everywhere is extremely encouraging in terms of the future prospects for this film", he added.

Sundance received a record 12,146 submissions this year, among which were over 4000 feature-length films. From these, just 12 U.S. and 12 international films were selected for competition.

"Whenever anyone asks me what Fire in the Blood is all about, I always say it's about the crime of the century. I felt totally compelled to make this film because the historian in me first could not believe, and then could not accept that there was not a single film or even book in circulation which told this endlessly fascinating and important story," said Gray. "Sundance is the biggest and best possible stage for films like this, and I am immensely grateful that the festival selectors shared our view that this is a story the world absolutely needs to know about. And, without giving too much away, I'm certain that the hugely positive leadership role played by India and Indians in turning this story from one of unspeakable horror into one of hope and resurrection will be a great source of inspiration and pride for audiences in this country and beyond."

"Getting a film selected for the Sundance Film Festival is an immense honour and a tremendous achievement for Dylan, who has spent five years making this film" said Executive Producer Christopher Hird of Dartmouth Films in London (The End of the Line, Black Gold, The Flaw and John Pilger's The War You Don't See), adding "Sundance is the festival which sets the agenda for independent film for the rest of the year and so I confidently expect that Fire in the Blood will be seen around the world and have a noticeable impact on public attitudes and public policy, as well as telling an important contemporary story about India."

Fire in the Blood will be released in Picturehouse and other select cinemas around the UK and Ireland on February 22nd, 2013, in partnership with Dartmouth Films. This will be an unprecedented British theatrical release for an Indian independent or documentary film.

Theatrical release in India is tentatively planned for April 5th, 2013.

ABOUT THE FILM

An intricate tale of 'medicine, monopoly and malice', Fire in the Blood tells the story of how Western pharmaceutical companies and governments aggressively blocked access to low-cost AIDS drugs for the countries of Africa and the global south in the years after 1996 – causing ten million or more unnecessary deaths – and the improbable group of people who decided to fight back.

Shot on four continents and including contributions from global figures such as Bill Clinton, Desmond Tutu and Joseph Stiglitz, Fire in the Blood is the never-before-told true story of the remarkable coalition which came together to stop 'the Crime of the Century' and save millions of lives in the process.

As the film makes clear, however, this story is by no means over. With dramatic past victories having given way to serious setbacks engineered far from public view, the real fight for access to life-saving medicine is almost certainly just beginning.

SHORT SYNOPSIS

In the late 1990s and early 2000s Western governments and pharmaceutical companies blocked low-cost antiretroviral drugs from reaching AIDS-stricken Africa and other parts of the global south, causing 10 million or more unnecessary deaths. This is the untold true story of the improbable group of people who decided to fight back.

LOGLINE

The untold true story of how an unlikely group of people took on giant pharmaceutical companies and major Western governments to stop 'the Crime of the Century' and save millions of lives.

ABOUT DYLAN MOHAN GRAY

Trained as a historian, Mumbai-based Indian-Canadian filmmaker Dylan Mohan Gray has worked as first assistant director and second unit director on feature films in over two dozen countries with numerous leading directors including Fatih Akin, Peter Greenaway, Paul Greengrass, Deepa Mehta and Mira Nair.

Fire in the Blood is his first feature-length film as writer/director.

TRAILER:
https://vimeo.com/54179420

WEBSITE:
www.fireintheblood.com(go to PRESS tab for clips, production notes and high-res stills)

FACEBOOK:
www.facebook.com/fireintheblood

TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/fitbmovie

FILM STILLS/HEADSHOTS:
http://smu.gs/u6XdVn

Picks And piques/Snippet Film Reviews/Films released 18Jan2012/Johnson Thomas

$
0
0



Picks And piques/Snippet Film Reviews/Films released 18Jan2012/Johnson Thomas
 
Film: Inkaar(Hindi) Rating: *  * ½ Much ado about nothing. Starts out as a sexual harassment imbroglio but ends up as a love story. Hard to comprehend.
 
Film: Mumbai Mirror(Hindi ) Rating: *  *. The Bhindi Bazaar inc director Ankush Bhatt revisits Mumbai’s dark underbelly in this criminal cops versus criminal thriller. Lacks finesse!
 
Film: Bandook(Hindi)  Rating: * ½ Director and lead actor Aditya Om takes up he gun in his quest for Power. Low on firepower. 
 
Film: Pune 52(Marathi) Rating: *  *  *  An attempted noir thriller that is strong on atmosphere and crucially lacking in script sense
 
Film: Broken City(English) Rating: *  *  * " A  political thriller that attempts to embellish it’s theme of moral and urban decay in noir style.
 
Film: The Last Stand(English)  Rating: *  * ½  Arnold S makes a comeback in a western with all guns blazing and little else. Fans wont be disappointed though.
 
Film: Les Miserables(English) Rating: *  *  * ½ A glorious adaptation of a long-running stage musical that manages to stay true to the original. Terrific singing performances .
Viewing all 783 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images